March 28

Three Mile Island Nuclear Accident Begins

197920th CenturyDisasterNorth Americahighexpanded detail

Equipment malfunctions and operator missteps at the Three Mile Island Unit 2 reactor near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, produced the most serious accident in U.S. commercial nuclear power history.

Summary

At the Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station in Pennsylvania, a series of equipment failures and operator errors unfolded in the early morning hours. A stuck relief valve allowed coolant to escape from the Unit 2 reactor, leading to overheating and partial core meltdown. Plant operators initially misread instruments and took actions that worsened the situation. By midday on March 28, 1979, radioactive gases had been released, prompting public concern and evacuations. The incident was contained without immediate fatalities, but it exposed critical flaws in reactor design, training, and emergency procedures. Investigations followed rapidly.

Context

By the late 1970s, pressurized-water reactors supplied a growing share of U.S. electricity, with designs emphasizing multiple redundant safety systems and automatic shutdown features. The Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station, operated by Metropolitan Edison, consisted of two such units on the Susquehanna River; Unit 2 had entered commercial service only months earlier in December 1978. Federal oversight rested with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, whose rules required plants to maintain auxiliary feedwater capability and to train operators for loss-of-coolant scenarios.

What Happened

At approximately 4:00 a.m. on March 28, 1979, a blockage in the condensate polisher system caused the main feedwater pumps in the non-nuclear secondary loop to stop, cutting heat removal from the steam generators. The reactor automatically scrammed, but decay heat continued. The pilot-operated relief valve on the pressurizer opened to relieve rising primary-system pressure yet failed to close when pressure dropped, allowing coolant to escape into the reactor coolant drain tank. Control-room instruments showed only that the valve’s solenoid had de-energized, leading operators to believe the valve had reseated.

Aftermath

Operators, misled by pressurizer level indications and lacking direct confirmation of valve position, throttled emergency core-cooling flow and later secured the reactor-coolant pumps to prevent vibration. With insufficient cooling, portions of the core overheated and partially melted. Radioactive gases and iodine escaped into the containment and, to a limited extent, the environment; by midday, low-level releases prompted Pennsylvania officials to advise evacuation of pregnant women and young children within five miles. No immediate injuries or fatalities occurred among workers or the public.

Legacy

The accident prompted the NRC to mandate improved instrumentation, simulator-based operator training, fitness-for-duty programs, and stronger emergency-planning requirements. It also led to the formation of the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations and slowed the licensing and construction of new reactors in the United States for more than three decades. Internationally, the event became a reference point for safety-culture reforms and remains classified as an International Nuclear Event Scale Level 5 accident.

Why It Matters

The March 28 accident prompted sweeping regulatory reforms by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, including improved operator training, better instrumentation, and enhanced emergency planning. It slowed nuclear power expansion in the United States and increased public scrutiny of the industry worldwide. The event remains a benchmark for nuclear safety standards and risk communication.

Related Questions

What started the sequence of events at Three Mile Island?

A blockage in the condensate polisher system shut down the main feedwater pumps in the secondary loop, triggering an automatic reactor shutdown.

Why did operators fail to recognize the loss-of-coolant accident?

Control-room instruments gave misleading indications about the stuck relief valve and pressurizer water level, and operators had not been trained for this specific combination of symptoms.

How much radiation reached the public?

The average additional dose to people in the area was about one millirem—less than a chest X-ray—with no detectable health effects documented by multiple government studies.

What immediate regulatory changes followed the accident?

The NRC required upgraded operator training, better plant instrumentation, revised emergency plans, and enhanced oversight of equipment reliability.

Did the accident halt U.S. nuclear construction?

No new reactor orders were placed for decades afterward, and many planned units were canceled as public confidence and regulatory costs rose.

Disaster Kit Pro: Natural and technological disasters with preparedness relevance, including nuclear incidents.

Explore More

Search Archive

Sources

  1. Backgrounder on the Three Mile Island Accident - NRC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Accessed 2026-07-09.
  2. Three Mile Island accident - Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation. Accessed 2026-07-09.
Back to March 28