June 26
Supreme Court Legalizes Same-Sex Marriage Nationwide
The Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision required every state to license and recognize same-sex marriages, resolving years of conflicting state laws and lower-court rulings.
Summary
By 2015, same-sex marriage was already legal in many U.S. states following years of state-level litigation and shifting public opinion. Cases from Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee reached the Supreme Court after conflicting lower court rulings on marriage equality. On June 26, 2015, the Court issued its 5-4 decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, holding that the Fourteenth Amendment requires states to license and recognize same-sex marriages. Justice Anthony Kennedy's majority opinion framed marriage as a fundamental right tied to liberty and equality. The ruling immediately extended marriage rights to all 50 states and territories.
Context
By the mid-2010s, same-sex marriage had become legal in more than thirty states through a combination of state court decisions, legislative action, and voter initiatives, yet a patchwork of bans remained in place elsewhere. Earlier Supreme Court precedents had begun to reshape constitutional understandings of liberty and equality in matters of intimacy and family. Lawrence v. Texas in 2003 struck down criminal sodomy laws, while United States v. Windsor in 2013 invalidated the federal Defense of Marriage Act’s restriction on recognizing same-sex marriages for federal benefits. These rulings, together with rapid shifts in public attitudes and a series of circuit-court decisions striking down state bans, set the stage for a national resolution.
The conflicting outcomes among federal appeals courts created a clear circuit split that invited Supreme Court review. In 2014 the Fourth, Seventh, Ninth, and Tenth Circuits had found state marriage bans unconstitutional, but the Sixth Circuit upheld the bans in Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee. That split prompted the Court to grant certiorari in cases consolidated under the name Obergefell v. Hodges. The litigation reflected both the personal stakes for couples seeking legal recognition and the broader constitutional question of whether the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantees of due process and equal protection extended to the right to marry.
What Happened
The consolidated cases originated in district courts in Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee. Plaintiffs included couples such as April DeBoer and Jayne Rowse in Michigan, who sought joint adoption rights, and James Obergefell and John Arthur in Ohio, who had married in Maryland and needed Ohio to recognize their marriage on Arthur’s death certificate. All four district courts ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, finding the state bans unconstitutional. Those victories were appealed to the Sixth Circuit, which reversed in a November 2014 decision that relied on the 1971 precedent Baker v. Nelson and upheld the bans.
The Supreme Court granted review and heard oral argument on April 28, 2015. Solicitor General Donald Verrilli participated on behalf of the United States in support of the plaintiffs. On June 26, 2015, the Court issued its decision. Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote for the five-justice majority, joined by Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan. The opinion held that the Fourteenth Amendment requires states both to license same-sex marriages and to recognize those lawfully performed in other states. Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Thomas, and Alito dissented in separate opinions.
Aftermath
The ruling took effect immediately across all fifty states, the District of Columbia, and U.S. territories. County clerks began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples within hours or days, and states that had previously refused recognition updated their records and policies. Some local officials briefly resisted on religious grounds, prompting further litigation over accommodations, but the core requirement of licensing and recognition was swiftly implemented nationwide.
Legacy
Obergefell established marriage equality as a nationwide constitutional right and overruled Baker v. Nelson, closing a major chapter in the legal struggle for LGBTQ+ equality. The decision has been cited in subsequent cases addressing related questions of dignity, autonomy, and equal protection, while also fueling ongoing debates about religious exemptions and the scope of judicial review. Historians view it as a culmination of decades of advocacy, litigation, and cultural change that transformed the legal definition of marriage in the United States.
Why It Matters
The decision resolved a patchwork of state laws and established nationwide marriage equality, affecting millions of couples and influencing subsequent LGBTQ+ rights cases. It built on earlier precedents like Lawrence v. Texas and marked a major expansion of constitutional protections for personal autonomy. The ruling has been cited in debates over religious exemptions and remains foundational in U.S. civil rights jurisprudence.
Related Questions
What constitutional provisions did the Court rely on?
The majority grounded its holding in both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Which states were directly involved in the litigation?
The cases originated in Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee, whose bans were at issue before the Sixth Circuit.
How many justices were in the majority?
Five justices joined the majority opinion written by Justice Kennedy.
Did the decision apply only to licensing or also to recognition of out-of-state marriages?
The ruling required states both to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples and to recognize valid marriages performed elsewhere.
What earlier precedent did the Court overturn?
The decision expressly overruled Baker v. Nelson, the 1971 case that had allowed states to refuse recognition of same-sex marriages.
Related Portfolio Site
America 250 Atlas: Supreme Court Legalizes Same-Sex Marriage Nationwide is part of U.S. presidential, constitutional, or national civic history.
Explore More
Related Events
Sources
- Obergefell v. Hodges | 576 U.S. 644 (2015), Justia. Accessed 2026-07-12.
- Obergefell v. Hodges, Wikimedia Foundation. Accessed 2026-07-12.