February 5

Byron De La Beckwith Convicted in Medgar Evers Murder

199420th CenturyCivil RightsNorth Americaexpanded detail

Three decades after the assassination of civil rights leader Medgar Evers, a Mississippi jury convicted white supremacist Byron De La Beckwith of the crime that had twice ended in mistrials.

Summary

On February 5, 1994, a Mississippi jury convicted white supremacist Byron De La Beckwith of the 1963 assassination of civil rights leader Medgar Evers. Evers, the NAACP's field secretary in Mississippi, had been shot in the back outside his Jackson home while his family watched from inside. De La Beckwith, a segregationist with ties to white supremacist groups, was tried twice in the 1960s but escaped conviction due to hung juries. New evidence and a changed political climate led to his retrial decades later. The verdict came after Evers' widow Myrlie Evers worked tirelessly for justice.

Context

In the early 1960s, Mississippi remained a center of entrenched segregation where Black citizens faced widespread barriers to voting, education, and public facilities. Medgar Evers served as the NAACP's first field secretary in the state, investigating lynchings, organizing boycotts, and pushing voter registration drives that drew intense hostility from white supremacist groups and local officials. His visibility made him a frequent target of threats.

The June 1963 assassination of Evers outside his Jackson home occurred amid a wave of violence against civil rights workers. Authorities recovered a rifle linked to Byron De La Beckwith, a known segregationist with ties to the Citizens' Council and other white supremacist organizations, yet two trials the following year produced hung juries drawn exclusively from white male pools. The outcomes reflected the racial composition of juries and the political climate that shielded perpetrators of racial violence.

By the 1980s, shifting attitudes toward civil rights-era crimes and new scrutiny of old cases created openings for renewed prosecutions. Investigative reporting and family advocacy highlighted flaws in the original proceedings, setting the stage for a third trial under different legal and social conditions.

What Happened

Hinds County authorities reopened the case in the late 1980s after journalist Jerry Mitchell documented irregularities in the 1964 jury selection process. Myrlie Evers, the victim's widow and a rising NAACP leader, had long pressed officials to act. In 1990, a grand jury issued a new indictment, leading to De La Beckwith's arrest in Tennessee and extradition to Mississippi.

The third trial convened in early 1994. Prosecutors relied on the original physical evidence, including a fingerprint on the murder weapon, supplemented by testimony from witnesses who recounted De La Beckwith boasting of the killing in the years since, including at a Ku Klux Klan event. On February 5, 1994, the jury—composed of eight Black and four white members—returned a guilty verdict after several days of deliberation.

The court immediately sentenced the seventy-three-year-old defendant to life in prison. De La Beckwith maintained his innocence throughout the proceedings.

Aftermath

The conviction brought immediate relief to the Evers family and civil rights advocates who had followed the case for decades. Myrlie Evers expressed profound satisfaction that accountability had finally been achieved. De La Beckwith remained incarcerated until his death in 2001.

The verdict drew national attention as one of the first successful modern prosecutions of a civil rights-era killing and prompted discussions about reopening other long-dormant cases.

Legacy

The 1994 outcome demonstrated that persistent advocacy and evolving investigative standards could overcome earlier obstructions to justice. It reinforced Medgar Evers' place in the civil rights pantheon as a pioneer whose work advanced voter registration and desegregation efforts despite lethal opposition. The case also inspired similar cold-case reviews across the South.

Cultural depictions, including the 1996 film Ghosts of Mississippi, kept the story in public view. Myrlie Evers' decades-long campaign highlighted the personal dimensions of seeking historical accountability, while the jury's makeup signaled broader changes in Mississippi's civic life.

Why It Matters

The 1994 conviction symbolized accountability for civil rights-era violence and demonstrated that delayed justice remained possible through renewed investigations. It reinforced the legacy of Medgar Evers' activism against segregation and voter suppression. The case highlighted persistent efforts to confront America's racial history and influenced other cold case prosecutions from the era.

Related Questions

Who was Medgar Evers?

Medgar Evers served as the NAACP's first field secretary in Mississippi, where he organized voter registration drives, investigated racial violence, and challenged segregation.

Why were the 1960s trials unsuccessful?

Both ended with hung juries drawn entirely from white male pools in a state where racial bias heavily influenced the justice system.

What new evidence supported the 1994 conviction?

Witnesses testified that De La Beckwith had bragged about the murder in the intervening decades, including at a Klan rally, while the original rifle evidence remained central.

How did Myrlie Evers influence the outcome?

She refused to let the case drop, became an NAACP leader, and worked with prosecutors and journalists to secure the retrial.

What was the makeup of the 1994 jury?

Eight Black and four white jurors deliberated and returned the guilty verdict.

Explore More

Search Archive

Sources

  1. White supremacist convicted of killing Medgar Evers, HISTORY.com. Accessed 2026-07-08.
Back to February 5