April 11
Apollo 13 Launches Toward the Moon
The third planned lunar landing mission launched without incident only to encounter a sudden oxygen tank failure that forced the crew into an improvised fight for survival.
Summary
NASA launched Apollo 13 on April 11, 1970, from Kennedy Space Center as the third planned lunar landing mission. Commanded by Jim Lovell with Jack Swigert and Fred Haise, the crew aimed for the Fra Mauro highlands. The Saturn V rocket performed nominally at liftoff, placing the spacecraft on a translunar trajectory. Two days later, an oxygen tank explosion in the service module crippled the electrical and life-support systems. The crew used the lunar module as a lifeboat to loop around the Moon and return safely to Earth on April 17, demonstrating remarkable improvisation under crisis.
Context
Following the triumph of Apollo 11 in 1969, NASA pressed ahead with additional lunar landings intended to advance scientific objectives rather than simply repeat the feat of reaching the surface. Apollo 13 was designated an H-type mission, emphasizing precision landing techniques and targeted geological sampling at a site selected for its scientific promise.
The Apollo program itself traced its origins to President John F. Kennedy’s 1961 call to land astronauts on the Moon before the end of the decade, building on the incremental successes of Mercury and Gemini. By 1970 public attention had begun to fade and congressional funding had already declined, resulting in the cancellation of some later planned flights.
Operational support centered on the Mission Control Center in Houston, opened in 1965 and organized around flight directors who held final authority for real-time decisions affecting crew safety.
What Happened
On April 11, 1970, at 19:13 UTC, the Saturn V rocket SA-508 lifted off from Launch Complex 39A at Kennedy Space Center. The crew consisted of commander Jim Lovell, command module pilot Jack Swigert—who had replaced originally assigned pilot Ken Mattingly after the latter’s exposure to rubella—and lunar module pilot Fred Haise. The spacecraft, comprising command and service module Odyssey and lunar module Aquarius, performed its translunar injection burn and docked without issue.
Two days later, on April 13, the crew carried out a standard procedure to stir the service module’s oxygen tanks. The action caused an explosion inside one tank that ruptured both oxygen supplies, venting their contents into space and disabling the service module’s electrical power and propulsion systems.
With the command module’s main systems shut down to conserve its limited resources, the three astronauts moved into the lunar module Aquarius, which was never intended to support a crew of three for four days. Mission Control improvised new procedures for power management, water conservation, and carbon dioxide removal, including a makeshift adapter that allowed command module scrubber cartridges to function in the lunar module. The spacecraft continued on a free-return trajectory, passing 254 kilometers from the lunar surface on April 15 before a successful reentry and splashdown in the South Pacific on April 17.
Aftermath
The crew was recovered by the USS Iwo Jima within hours of splashdown. The dramatic events briefly revived national interest in the space program, with millions following the recovery on television. A subsequent review board determined that inadequate preflight testing of the oxygen tank had allowed damaged wiring to remain undetected.
Recommended changes, including the removal of potentially combustible materials from inside the tanks, were adopted for Apollo 14 and later missions.
Legacy
Apollo 13 demonstrated both the fragility of complex space systems and the effectiveness of extensive ground training and real-time problem solving. Its lessons directly influenced spacecraft design modifications, emergency procedures, and mission planning for the remaining Apollo flights as well as the Skylab program.
The mission has remained a prominent example of resilience under pressure, memorialized in books, documentaries, and the 1995 feature film Apollo 13, and continues to illustrate how near-failure can strengthen institutional commitment to safety in human spaceflight.
Why It Matters
The mission highlighted both the risks of human spaceflight and the effectiveness of NASA's engineering and training. Its safe return reinforced public and political support for the Apollo program despite the near-disaster. Lessons from the oxygen tank failure and emergency procedures influenced subsequent spacecraft design, safety protocols, and mission planning for later lunar and Skylab operations.
Related Questions
Why was Jack Swigert substituted onto the Apollo 13 crew?
He replaced Ken Mattingly, who had been exposed to rubella and could not fly.
What directly caused the service module failure?
An oxygen tank explosion triggered by damaged wiring during a routine stirring procedure.
How did the crew survive without the service module’s systems?
They used the lunar module as a lifeboat and followed power- and resource-conserving procedures developed by Mission Control.
What was Apollo 13’s intended landing site on the Moon?
The Fra Mauro highlands, selected for its geological interest.
What safety changes followed the Apollo 13 investigation?
Modifications to oxygen tank design and testing eliminated combustible materials inside the tanks for future missions.
Related Portfolio Site
Daily Earth View: Apollo 13 space mission launch
Explore More
Related Events
Sources
- Apollo 13, Wikimedia Foundation. Accessed 2026-07-09.